|
... as your partner not just your supplier. |
|
Compare For Yourself ... Copper Versus Aluminum Rotor Construction Some of our competitors will try to persuade you
to save a few dollars and settle for aluminum rotors on their large machines. We
believe you cannot afford to operate without copper rotor construction. Please
read on and decide for yourself. Copper ... The real test for rotor material is during starting because this is when the motor is subjected to extreme operating conditions. During this period, large AC motors can be rotor limited . This means that the rotor cage will reach its thermal limit before the stator winding. In this demanding period of operation, copper offers a significantly higher range of resistivity and a much higher thermal margin. Copper also provides a lower coefficient of expansion, higher tensile strength, and ideal conductivity. Without a doubt, ETI's copper rotor construction gives you greater reliability, efficiency, and versatility with which aluminum cannot compare.
Today, many motor manufacturers have switched to fabricated aluminum rotors in their large motors, presumably because of the lower cost of aluminum. In fact, most of our competitors have standardized on aluminum rotors. Aluminum rotors have many limitations compared with copper. For example, an aluminum die cast rotor cannot be repaired. And aluminum fabricated rotors only can be repaired with great difficulty. ETI uses only copper on large AC machines because our experience leads us to believe that aluminum rotors are more likely to fail.
Our experience leads us to believe that aluminum rotor designs are more likely to fail and are more difficult to repair compared with copper. The primary causes for most rotor failures are loose rotor bars and poor bar to end ring welds. By now you already understand how copper's inherent advantages -lower coefficients of expansion, higher tensile strength, and improved joint design -make it a superior material. ETI's practice of swaging, brazing, and thru-bolt construction further ensure long- term reliability. In the unlikely event that a copper rotor does fail, it is significantly easier to repair than aluminum. Copper's usual rectangular design makes it easy for repair shops to rework bars and laminations. Aluminum bars, on the other hand, are built in a wider variety of shapes with correspondingly designed slots in the rotor laminations. We believe that the resulting lamination slot design often makes aluminum rotors either difficult or impossible to repair. Don't be misled by aluminum's lower initial selling price. Because of the risk of failure, aluminum may cost you a lot more in the long run. |
|